The truth, look, I have to be honest.
I would have liked to attend the Meeting but was not and I was very angry because I lack. Yes, sir. I really need!.
Well, first let me tell you the tremendous silly I did when I learned of the invitation. Look what I did: I wrote and told
(thus I can be gross), said: "Hello, I am willing to go But I can not."
do you mean aicant? Of course they "can "but then I did not think and say (that I say to comfort me) say it was because of this nonsense I was not there.
Who knows? Maybe so, no? (Say yes. Just to console me, hehe)
Well, as I was saying, the Meeting had been very, very different if it had been there for the sole and simple reason that I would not have allowed (or allowed others) a couple of things:
1. Had not allowed a single blogger supper that night unaccompanied.
2. I would not have allowed out of there without having shaken hands (and secured to learn the name) of the 145 remaining and the moderators and panelists.
(Bishop Lombardi probably would have been tempted to call my case to the Swiss Guard could secure almost)
That would have done without even the impossible to break the circle of old friends who did that for a minute broke (that I know because I watched through the camera's father Roderick).
probably would have made a fool, (conservatively) a dozen times to be convinced that everyone had at least shaken hands and said his name.
is that pa `I say that what is going one there, then? Pa'ver to the usual suspects saying the same thing? No, what's going ...! You go to the Vatican to a Meeting of bloggers to do what you can do par excellence, your passion: to communicate, donated, delivered, shared ... come into play with all one's face that reality.
Finally, the Meeting if he had been there would have been very different but I was not, therefore, know that you lost to have taken the "very pleasing remembrance" of what had been the Meeting if I had been there.
What can we do? It will be the next in which, perhaps, if "can"!
I would have liked to attend the Meeting but was not and I was very angry because I lack. Yes, sir. I really need!. Well, first let me tell you the tremendous silly I did when I learned of the invitation. Look what I did: I wrote and told
(thus I can be gross), said: "Hello, I am willing to go But I can not."
do you mean aicant? Of course they "can "but then I did not think and say (that I say to comfort me) say it was because of this nonsense I was not there.
Who knows? Maybe so, no? (Say yes. Just to console me, hehe)
Well, as I was saying, the Meeting had been very, very different if it had been there for the sole and simple reason that I would not have allowed (or allowed others) a couple of things:
1. Had not allowed a single blogger supper that night unaccompanied.
2. I would not have allowed out of there without having shaken hands (and secured to learn the name) of the 145 remaining and the moderators and panelists.
(Bishop Lombardi probably would have been tempted to call my case to the Swiss Guard could secure almost)
That would have done without even the impossible to break the circle of old friends who did that for a minute broke (that I know because I watched through the camera's father Roderick).
probably would have made a fool, (conservatively) a dozen times to be convinced that everyone had at least shaken hands and said his name.
is that pa `I say that what is going one there, then? Pa'ver to the usual suspects saying the same thing? No, what's going ...! You go to the Vatican to a Meeting of bloggers to do what you can do par excellence, your passion: to communicate, donated, delivered, shared ... come into play with all one's face that reality.
Finally, the Meeting if he had been there would have been very different but I was not, therefore, know that you lost to have taken the "very pleasing remembrance" of what had been the Meeting if I had been there.
What can we do? It will be the next in which, perhaps, if "can"!
0 comments:
Post a Comment